The day after the July 5th victory near Carthage, MO the dusty ranks of the Missouri State Guards were drawn up outside the town to be reviewed by Generals Sterling Price, Ben McCulloch and State General N. B. Pearce. The Missourians cheered loudly; these grey uniformed and well equipped men from Arkansas were the first Confederate soldiers they’ve seen, and they inspired hope. They also marched under a flag never before seen in MO, the Stars and Bars of the new Southern Confederacy.
If the Missouri volunteers happened to give the appearance of a nondescript mob, they had reason to. Monetary support, meaning the State Treasury, was locked up in state banks in every town occupied by Federal troops who also had control of the railroads, telegraph and mail. The purchase of military stores and convenient transport was non- existent. A large number were unarmed because the huge U S Arsenal at St Louis had transferred all weapons to IL long ago.
McCulloch was appalled at the thought of facing the trained Springfield-based army of Lyon and Sigel with such a rabble and said as much to Price, who promised improvement. Knowing intuitively the best place to defend Arkansas was in MO, McCulloch loaned 615 fine rifles to the Mexican War Veteran and former Missouri Governor, before rejoining his Pelican State contingent near Maysville, AR. It will be recalled the 3rd LA Infantry was detached from the column at this encampment previous to McCulloch’s accelerated thrust to Neosho, MO on the night of July 4th.
General Price took his mostly mounted state guard farther into southwest MO to Cowskin Prairie, of which a portion was three miles from the Arkansas boundary and within close supporting distance of Maysville. This bivouac proved an excellent selection for its many clear water creeks and grazing surface. Abundant cornfields were at hand also. Nearby lead mines answered for much needed firearm ammunition and improvised artillery projectiles. Gen. Lyon was stalled at Springfield for want of a reliable supply system. So, with time on his side Price also assigned prior service officers the tasks of providing drill, instruction and discipline toward converting the raw material into an army. In his book, Sterling Price and the Civil War in the West, noted historian and writer Albert Castel in part presented this description of the rank and file; “All of his troops had taken up arms (at least figuratively) out of a strong and sincere conviction that the sovereignty of their state had been wantonly violated and that their own rights and liberties were in danger….By and large they were young, hardy men of middle class farming families, intelligent and in many instances well educated.”
About this time in July, Colonel Patrick R. Cleburne’s 1st AR Infantry Regiment, (later15th), reached Pittman’s Ferry 50 miles from the Mississippi and 400 yards south of the MO state line. This location was on the beautiful Current River, several miles north of Pocahontas, a town situated where that stream joined the Black River.
The 33 year old Irish immigrant and Helena lawyer had previously led a militia company to Little Rock during the arsenal crises back in January. The event occurred when a conniving government official deceived the Helena Militia into thinking they were summoned by the governor to resist Federal reinforcement.
Farther east the 3rd AR Inf. Regiment was mustered into Confederate service at Lynchburg VA. This regiment was raised by former U. S. Congressman Albert Rust of Union County. From the time of its induction until July 15, the unit was whipped into shape by the VMI graduates who had also performed the same unrelenting service for Fagan’s 1st AR the previous month. The 3rd was assigned to the command of General W. W. Loring and sent to Monterey in North central VA, amid the low rumble of cannonading many miles toward the east.
Copies of divorce records are permanently kept by county Record Office of Licensing Branch’s, and may be obtained at any time. The guidelines that must be followed may vary by state, and unfortunately you must obtain your AR divorce records through the Office in the state your divorce took place in, no matter your current location. The waiting period can sometimes be quite long depending on the workload being experienced at the location you must deal with.
Arkansas divorce records are vital for a number of reasons. First of all they are the proof that your divorce was finalized in a Court of Law and that the documents were signed by a Judge. Both of these scenarios have to have been met for a divorce to be considered legal and complete.
Many people can go through the process of divorce and believe they’ve reached the conclusion of the affair when in reality they have not. This can be the case for a few reasons, and occurs quite frequently in cases where an uncontested divorce has been filed, and the respondent fails to file a response.
Saving yourself future difficulties by ensuring your divorce in legal and finalized is of the utmost importance. The wait just to receive copies of these documents can take some time, the process of still having to finalize the divorce and receive the documents considerably more. If these documents were required for to complete another process and you this was the case it could prove extremely troublesome.
The number one reason for getting copies of these documents is so one can remarry, and these documents naturally are required for this to take place. Changing one’s legal name and applying for landed immigration status could also warrant the necessity for these records.
Divorce is an ever more common occurrence, and several websites have sprung up that deal solely in keeping a database of these records to help speed up the process, and make it easy for people to not only get their own Arkansas divorce records, put look up the divorce records of others if they wish.
In a situation where you need to present these records, try to ascertain whether the documents need to be certified or not. A certified copy will display the signature of the proper authority and feature a raised seal. Be aware that getting a certified copy will take longer than an uncertified one, so if your particular need does not require a certified copy, you’re better off quickly acquiring an uncertified one.
Virtually every newlywed cannot imagine themselves getting a divorce. Unfortunately however, over 40% of Americans today are reported to have a divorce record. It is sad that as our society is increasingly modernized, the sanctity of marriage has fallen from grace.
Arkansas divorce records can provide a good amount of data about someone. The names and addresses of those involved in the divorce, age, children involved, custody, alimony, reasons for divorce, are among many of the various pieces of information you can obtain. Under Arkansas state law, official divorce records remain one of the most useful and reliable sources of information for background checks.
Compared to getting an official copy of the record, obtaining the information on the record itself is much simpler. There exist many different online divorce record directories and online public record websites. Signing up with such a website allows unlimited searches on their database, virtually giving you access to over hundreds of millions of public records collected over the years. Searching the bigger online directories via either name or geographic location such as state, city or county, will likely give you the data you need.
Online divorce records search providers and databases are well received and widely used as they are easy to use, and you can get the information you need in a short period of time. It offers not only privacy but also credibility. You can search by name, or by geographic location. For example, you can find Arkansas divorce records at the county registry. Online divorce record databases can be accessed from anywhere, and provide a host of information.
The more prominent websites available provide not only accurate information, but also a large database containing hundreds of millions of public records, giving you the scope you need to obtain any information you want. While the bigger websites may charge a higher fee, with the sensitive nature of divorce itself, it is better to have the assurance that your information is accurate.
Government Agency lawyers live in a bubble. They’re protected by the same system of corruption, nepotism, waste, fraud and abuse that causes so much hardship to many Federal employees. As long as these lawyers tow the party line, their jobs are safe; they get nice pensions; and they don’t have to worry about much.
While not all Government lawyers act in this way, the temptation to do so is enormous. Following the Agency director, Special Agent in Charge or some other high ranking bureaucrat is generally a big key to most any Federal Agency position, so a lawyer’s should be no different.
However, there’s one authority greater than that bureaucrat. It sends shock waves through all Federal Agency lawyers and in the vast majority of cases, these people are shocked by a new system of authority, something completely foreign: The Bar. Even Bill Clinton lost his Arkansas law license because the Arkansas bar people didn’t care that he only committed perjury about sex.
The vast majority of bar complaints come from disgruntled clients who didn’t get a good result on the case, so they blame their lawyer. The average lawyer in private practice will get a few of these in his or her career. For this reason, private practice attorneys after a number of years in practice have well developed defensive systems to cover themselves against these complaints.
Agency lawyers don’t deal with this system and don’t have the first clue about it. As such, they aren’t generally up on Professional Responsibility rules. The fear of suspension or disbarment can be so great, that the Agency lawyer simply may not have the stomach for a bar complaint threat. There’s very little reward for the Agency lawyer to go through one of these bar messes if it can be avoided.
Consider these examples that Agency lawyers don’t have the first clue about, yet fully support their bureaucrat bosses:
1. A federal employee has an existing whistle blower claim. To tighten the screws, the Agency says at mediation that if the employee refuses to take its low ball offer, the Agency will terminate the employee for reasons it already knows to be untrue. It’s unethical for lawyers to defend claims that have no merit. Since the federal employee will be filing another Merit Systems Protection Board claim against his/her agency, the agency lawyer will be litigating a claim: a frivolous, legal and factual claim because his/her bureaucrat boss ordered him to do so. His/her state’s bar – doesn’t care about the bubble – that’s a violation.
2. A federal employee has an existing legal action for discrimination and he/she is represented by an attorney. The Agency lawyer executes an order from bureaucrat boss to send the Proposal to Remove letter directly to the employee, notwithstanding the employee is represented by counsel. In most state bars, that’s a violation because the lawyer communicated directly with someone who that lawyer knew was represented. The agency lawyer had a professional responsibility requirement to communicate with that person’s lawyer and didn’t. His/her state’s bar – doesn’t care about the bubble – that’s a violation.
3. Someone at the U.S. State Department orders a U.S. Attorney not to disclose emails from Hillary Clinton as part of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit because they will her make her look bad. U.S. Attorney agrees. Federal Judge later finds out the U.S. Attorney was more loyal to the Clintons than to the Rules of Professional Responsibility that a lawyer must follow. That lawyer should get ready to become a lobbyist.
Here’s the bottom line: the bubble can’t protect the bad guys from everything.
Driving while intoxicated (DWI) is against the law in the state of Arkansas. The Arkansas DUI laws were designed to protect people using the roadways from injury and death due to the actions of drunk drivers. These laws can seem complex to someone who doesn’t have a legal education because they have different offense levels and different penalties depending on a number of factors in each individual case. Because these laws are so complex, it is extremely important that you contact an Arkansas DUI lawyer if you have been arrested for driving while intoxicated. Having a legal professional represent you is your best chance for presenting the best defense during your trial and can give you a better chance of winning than if you represented yourself.
Driving While Intoxicated
There are two ways that a person can be prosecuted for driving while intoxicated in the state of Arkansas. One of these ways is based on the impairment of the driver after consuming alcohol. With this type of prosecution, the case is built around the driver being too impaired to operate a motor vehicle. Driving habits, failure to perform sobriety tests successfully, the physical appearance of the defendant, and the smell of alcohol on the defendant may all be taken into consideration in this type of DWI case. The prosecutor does not have to prove any particular blood alcohol concentration level. The second type of DUI case is based on chemical testing, not on driver habits or behavior. In this type of DUI case, the defendant had a blood alcohol concentration level of greater than the legal limit of 0.08%. Whether the defendant was actually impaired is not relevant in this type of case. The prosecutor simply has to prove that the legal blood alcohol level was exceeded. Both types of cases have serious legal and administrative consequences so it is important that you contact an Arkansas DUI lawyer immediately so you have someone to guide you through the legal system and defend you both in court and at any Department of Motor Vehicles proceedings.
Arkansas DMV Penalties
Being charged with DUI means that you will have to deal with the Department of Motor Vehicles. The DMV can impose administrative punishments on you as a result of your DUI charge. Because experience can make these proceedings go more smoothly, it is important that you contact an Arkansas DUI attorney immediately after your arrest so you can be represented in both your criminal trial and any DMV proceedings against you. The penalties imposed by the DMV vary based on any prior offenses as well as your blood alcohol concentration level. For a first offense with alcohol, the penalty is a 120 day license suspension as long as your blood alcohol level was less than 0.18%. You may be able to get a restricted license that allows you to commute to and from work, but an Arkansas DUI lawyer would be your best source of information and advice. For a first offense with drugs, the penalty is a six-month license suspension. Refusal to submit to a chemical test results in a 180 day suspension, regardless of whether you committed a DUI offense or not. The administrative penalties for a second offense are a two year suspension with the possibility of receiving a restricted work permit after one year of the suspension. The penalty for a second chemical testing refusal is a two year suspension with no possibility of obtaining a restricted license. A third offense results in a suspension period of 30 months with no possibility of a restricted license for at least one year. A third refusal to submit to chemical testing results in a three year suspension with no option of receiving a restricted work license. Fourth and subsequent offenses result in a four year revocation of the driver’s license for DWI. For refusal to submit to chemical testing, a fourth offense results in the lifetime revocation of your license. There are no exceptions to this penalty. It is important that you have an Arkansas DUI lawyer represent you in DMV proceedings because the information gathered may help you in your trial. If you have refused to submit to chemical testing, it can also help to have your attorney refute the prosecutor’s claim that your refusal indicates guilt on your part.
Arkansas Criminal DUI Penalties
If you are charged with driving while intoxicated, you will not only face criminal charges, you will also face losing your license through the DMV. The criminal proceedings remain separate from the DMV proceedings and any penalties imposed by the court are separate from penalties imposed by the DMV. The criminal penalties vary with the severity of the offense, the number of prior DUI convictions, and other circumstances. Enhancements to these penalties can be made in specific situations. For a first DUI offense, you can face one day up to one year in jail, court costs of $300, and fines from $150-$1,000. The courts may use community service as an alternative to jail time for a first offense. A second DUI offense can result in 7 days to one year in jail, a fine of no less than $400 all the way up to $3,000, and $300 in court costs. The court may choose to replace jail time with a period of no less than 30 days of community service. If you have two prior convictions and are convicted a third time, you face 90 days to one year in jail and fines of no less than $900 and no more than $5,000. The court may choose to replace jail time with no less than 90 days of community service. If you have three prior convictions, a fourth DUI will be prosecuted as a felony, making the punishments more severe. You can face anywhere from one to six years of jail time and fines of no less than $900 and no more than $5,000. The court may substitute one year of community service for jail time if it is warranted. A fifth DUI charge is also prosecuted as a felony if you have four prior convictions, as are any subsequent offenses. You can face anywhere from two to ten years in a state penitentiary and fines of no less than $900 and no more than $5,000. The court may choose to impose two years of community service as an alternative to jail time.